Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 46
Likes Received: 10
Yesterday Google announced that from next year, it will use the rel="sponsored" attribute in order to identify and understand the paid links. What do you guys think about it apart from just being no-follow?
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 997
Likes Received: 64
I don't think that it is going to effect much on anything. Because while clicking away a user doesn't necessarily check whether the links is no-follow or something else.
Ask yourself this how many time while genuinely browsing the web you check the link attribute carefully??!!
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 159
Likes Received: 4
What I heard that its about no-follow attribute.
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 449
Likes Received: 60
Some are saying that all these fuss is for nothing. More or less its just the same.
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 6
Likes Received: 0
Google says there is no wrong attribute to use except in the case of sponsored links. If a link is marked as sponsored when it's not actually part of an ad or sponsorship, then the impact will be lessened.
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 937
Likes Received: 78
You people are thinking way too much then it is actually needed.
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 144
Likes Received: 6
What I don't understand is that why it is so big of a deal anyway?
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 456
Likes Received: 123
All the community boards have started working on making their links UGC.
Google's new rel="sponsored" attribute, good or bad?
![[-]](https://seomotionz.com/themes/cerulean/collapse.png)
