Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 151
Likes Received: 7
Many sites were hit in a good way. And many sites were hit in a bad way.
Some recovered their rankings and some fell terribly. From what I am noticing sites with improved content has made improvements. Its not in any specific niche or industry but in all of them.
What do you guys are seeing?
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 463
Likes Received: 125
Improved content is a relative term here. Improved presentation can be said. Sites with improved ux are clearly a winner in this update.
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 215
Likes Received: 14
It is for all niche! noticing improvement slowly and gradually.
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 463
Likes Received: 125
(03-27-2019, 05:33 AM)Autofresh.in Wrote: It is for all niche! noticing improvement slowly and gradually.
Congrats!!! And lets hope its stays.
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 941
Likes Received: 62
The sites which were hit by the Medic updates are getting well recovery. But I am also seeing comments of webmasters saying that they recovered a lot lately during this update and yet again it fell.
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 59
Likes Received: 0
Personally, we think that the hardest is over, since March 4, everything is stabilizing and we are also seeing an increase in the positioning of keywords and organic traffic .
As Google says, the best way to not be penalized by updates is to produce interesting content for users and not content for Google robots.
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 463
Likes Received: 125
(03-28-2019, 06:12 AM)albertocosta Wrote: Personally, we think that the hardest is over, since March 4, everything is stabilizing and we are also seeing an increase in the positioning of keywords and organic traffic .
As Google says, the best way to not be penalized by updates is to produce interesting content for users and not content for Google robots.
Yeah, but its not practical at all.
![[-]](https://seomotionz.com/themes/cerulean/collapse.png "[-]")
